A resource by Jayne Cravens
  via coyotecommunications.com & coyoteboard.com (same web site)

two primitive figures seeming to argue over what they are reading on smartphones

 
Section 5:

Messaging to Prevent & Address
Urban Legends, Myth, Rumors &
Organized Misinformation Campaigns


 

This page is part of a 11-part guide on preventing folklore, rumors (or rumours), urban myths and organized misinformation campaigns from interfering with development & aid/relief efforts, and government initiatives regarding public health, the environment, etc. It is not a stand-alone page. It should be read as part of the entire guide. This is the link to the introduction and index for the other pages in this guide.

Messaging

UNICEF promotes the idea of social mobilization as central to the success of communications efforts. UNICEF defines social mobilization as

a broad scale movement to engage people's participation in achieving a specific development goal through self-reliant efforts. It involves all relevant segments of society: decision and policy makers, opinion leaders, bureaucrats and technocrats, professional groups, religious associations, commerce and industry, communities and individuals. It is a planned decentralized process that seeks to facilitate change for development through a range of players engaged in interrelated and complementary efforts. It takes into account the felt needs of the people, embraces the critical principle of community involvement, and seeks to empower individuals and groups for action... Mobilizing the necessary resources, disseminating information tailored to targeted audiences, generating intersectoral support and fostering cross-professional alliances are also part of the process. Social mobilization in total aims at a continuum of activities in a broad strategic framework. The process encompasses dialogue and partnership with a wide spectrum of societal elements.

The ICEC and Global Social Mobilization, October 2000
The International Communication Enhancement Center
Tulane University

When misinformation breaks out, you are going to leverage the network of formal and informal community leaders, religious leaders, unions, doctors and others. But you must remember that by the time you reach out to these groups about myth-spreading they may already have started believing the myth. One meeting will NOT fully educate this (or any) group on how to communicate effectively. One meeting won't change minds if they already are leaning towards believing misinformation. Hostilities tend to be reduced when people believe their concerns are being heard and addressed. Allow those who are opposed to an activity, or who might be, to voice concerns, both publicly and privately. Remember that one meeting will probably not be enough for fears to be aired, and honest feedback may come through unofficial channels.

Keeping in mind the previous information about humans having a natural tendency to resist correction, think about non-threatening ways to talk with an audience about this natural tendency. The Oatmeal created panels to challenge readers in the USA about how humans do, or don't, accept factual information, and it's a really fun, non-threatening exercise. Could you create something similar to take a group through and discuss before you talk to them about research or revelations that might make them angry, frightened and/or hostile?

One of my favorite ways to create messaging to target a group is to work with representatives of that group regarding how they communicate about the message at hand. I might put various slogans or images in front of them and ask their feedback. Don't just ask yes or no questions ("Do you agree?"); ask questions that encourage the person to put the message in his or her own words ("How would you describe this initiative to, say, a mother that comes to you and is fearful about the activity?" or "Why do you think this initiative is important to the community?").

Make a list of common counter arguments against what you are trying to promote and how to address them, using the aforementioned and following advice. This will be a central part of your strategy. Revisit this and revise it continually, as you learn what works and what doesn't and as new arguments arise.

Explore the harm being caused by the misinformation you are trying to address. What are the real-world consequences of, say, not getting vaccinated, or believing that foreigners are in a country only to do something harmful, or voting for a candidate only based on a gut feeling? Can you show an actual person, family or community that has been harmed by the rumor or misinformation? Put a human face on the harm. This has proven particularly effective in getting anti-vaccine believers to reconsider their beliefs. 

Remember that you must be able to leverage local networks to deliver messaging on your behalf - otherwise, your outreach efforts will probably not work. Local health care workers, local leaders (official and unofficial), local NGO staff, local business people, local police - these are your messengers in countering misinformation. Also, you must work to convince these leaders - these influencers - that what they do must be reflected in what they say: as we learned during the COVID-19 global pandemic, people broke public health guidance when they saw those with privilege ignore them. Why should people socially-distance, avoid travel and wear masks when politicians and celebrities aren't? In fact, you need a strategy for what you are going to say and do when the inevitable happens: a photo of a politician, celebrity or other influencer doing exactly what public health officials said NOT to do goes viral.

Also remember that messaging that works with adults may not work with teens. Messaging that works with urban teens may be meaningless to rural teens. In understanding psychology and how it affects messaging, you have to appreciate the diversity of the audiences you must reach. The more you listen to these groups, the more you will understand how they perceive messages.

Don't prepare plans based solely on facts and statistics, because people don't reason with and respond to pure facts and logic alone. Think about how people -- both messengers and community members -- currently feel about the issues at hand, what their emotions are around the issues, and the symbolism is that they might be seeing in events and responses that might not be obvious via facts alone. Fully think about their emotional response, define it, and then look for the reasons behind their desire to believe something despite the facts. Think about what is important to them at their core, because of their values, and think about how to appeal to those values to steer them to truth. Appealing to their emotions may work better in changing hearts and minds, even if doing so might seem antithetical to staying fact-based, however, providing people with accurate information alone usually doesn’t help regarding a highly-emotional issue; they simply discount those facts. For instance, if they feel that family is more than important than anything, how could you frame the issue regarding family values? If people see themselves as religious, how could you frame the issue within that religion or its values? If you appeal to someone in a way that will reinforce what they identify as - a religious person, a mother, the head of the household, a farmer, a person that values practical experience over formal training, an environmentalist, a conservative, a patriot, a member of a particular tribe, etc. - you have a better chance of engaging them successfully.

That said, do provide references to scientific sites and information. For instance, provide references to reliable medical information, such as the University of Maryland Medical Center's Medical Reference Guide a comprehensive medical reference includes more than 50,000 pages of medically-reviewed health content written in human-friendly language. It includes a Complementary and Alternative Medicine Guide, which examines different herbal medicines, such as turmeric, from a medical research point of view. Also, Science-Based Medicine is a web site dedicated to evaluating medical treatments and products of interest to the public in a scientific light, and countering the often dangerous narrative of many "alternative" medicine advocates - though science-based, it uses very accessible language.

There are also web sites devoted to debunking specific rumors and to helping to create awareness about viral myths and misinformation campaigns, and their messaging is easy to re-share on social media. For instance,
  • in the USA, Snopes is a web site that thoroughly researches widely-circulated warnings and stories and evaluates their truthfulness.
     
  • There's also the That's Nonsense, which debunks trending misinformation on Facebook specifically.
     
  • Alt News is an India-based effort committed to debunking misinformation, disinformation and mal-information on social media and in mainstream media.
Again, remember that humans have natural tendency to resist correction. Correct information may make them double-down on their beliefs in misinformation. For instance, when people are given scientifically-based information that shows vaccines are safe and most certainly do NOT cause autism, people who believe vaccines are unhealthy will rarely change their minds. Instead, those people will say the information is false, that it's been manipulated by large pharmaceutical  companies, etc. Think about ways to guide people towards correct information while acknowledging their real grievances that may lead to the misinformation, and without making them feel or look "wrong" or stupid. Try to cite sources that they do believe in and trust. If you can talk about your own experience where you have yourself have been mislead, how you felt when you learned the truth, and how it felt to change your mind, all the better.

Identify those who might be possible sources of misinformation, intentionally or unintentionally, before undertaking any field-based activity. Try to understand their psychology of belief: why they or anyone else might believe something that is not true and reject or ignore fact-based information that contradicts that belief. Try to identify real grievances people have had with government, media, doctors, certain businesses, other communities, etc., that may lead to a resistance to fact-based information. Fully explore the reasons behind the desire people have to hold on to a belief despite the facts - you may need to create an ongoing communications strategy that addresses ONLY those reasons.

Be careful in how you characterize those that are resisting your medical information, your scientific data, etc. Belittling them with insults can create a backlash. No one likes to be called stupid - or for it to be insinuated that they are such - for instance. That said, DO build an ongoing, fact-based narrative that fully exposes motivations for misinformation, if there is such - for instance, various people and organizations showing the basis for the scientific fraud that gave rise to the fears regarding vaccines has helped tremendously in debunking harmful, dangerous myths about vaccines and autism.

Highlight and promote success stories. If you have changed someone's minds, sit down with that person and find out what helped them to change their mind. Telling that person's story, about how they thought about the issue before your interventions, and how they think now, could help convince others. Could you create a video of your interviewing them and share it on YouTube? Could that person become a spokesperson for you?

And work directly with reporters. The International Center for Journalists (ICFJ), is connecting journalists with health experts and newsroom leaders through a webinar series on COVID-19. They have produced various materials as part of the ICFJ Global Health Crisis Reporting Forum on Facebook. In a webinar to examine global trends in COVID-19 disinformation, Andy Carvin, senior fellow at the Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab), noted. "If it's only professionals working to correct the public record or clarify what the science is, there will continue to be misinformation and disinformation spreading."

small swirl icon denoting end of the text of this chapter

Back to the first page of this resource on preventing misinformation from interfering with development and aid initiatives.

Back to my development resources main page.  
  Discuss this web page, or comment on it, here.


  Quick Links 

   my home page
 
 my consulting services  &  my workshops & presentations
 
 my credentials & expertise

 Affirmation that this is web site is created & managed by a human.
 
 My book: The Last Virtual Volunteering Guidebook

 contact me   or   see my schedule
 
 Free Resources: Community Outreach, With & Without Tech

 Free Resources: On Community Engagement, Volunteering & Volunteerism

 Free Resources: Technology Tips for Non-Techies

 Free Resources: Nonprofit, NGO & other mission-based management resources

 Free Resources: Web Development, Maintenance, Marketing for non-Web designers

 Free Resources: Corporate philanthropy / social responsibility programs

 Free Resources: For people & groups that want to volunteer
 
 linking to or from my web site
 
 The Coyote Helps Foundation
 
 me on social media (follow me, like me, put me in a circle, subscribe to my newsletter)

support my workhow to support my work

To know when I have developed a new resource related to the above subjects, found a great resource by someone else, published a new blog or a new Tech4Impact email newsletter, uploaded a new video,
or to when & where I'm training or presenting, use any of the following social media apps to follow me on any of these social media platforms:

like me on Facebook      follow me on Twitter    Mastodon logo    follow me on Reddit    follow me on LinkedIn     view my YouTube videos


Disclaimer: No guarantee of accuracy or suitability is made by the poster/distributor of the materials on this web site.
This material is provided as is, with no expressed or implied warranty or liability.

See my web site's privacy policy.

Permission is granted to copy, present and/or distribute a limited amount of material from my web site without charge if the information is kept intact and without alteration, and is credited to:

Jayne Cravens & Coyote Communications,
          www.coyotebroad.com

Otherwise, please contact me for permission to reprint, present or distribute these materials (for instance, in a class or book or online event for which you intend to charge).

The art work and material on this site was created and is copyrighted 1996-2024
by Jayne Cravens, all rights reserved
(unless noted otherwise, or the art comes from a link to another web site).